Here will be the beginning of the end of a conversation I will have with the next guy who wants to sleep with me and I'm looking for a good excuse:
"I really do want to have sex with you, but I can't, it's Bush."
He will wince and say pardon me? I'll say, no, no, no it's PRESIDENT BUSH.
"The man who believes he's the Great God of the Western World says I should abstain. Actually he would like you to abstain, and cross your legs in solidarity along with every single man and woman, boy and girl, here and everywhere on this earth even in places where young girls are forced to have sex, and young boys and men feel it is their right, their duty to do the deed, an act that, honestly, might just be a natural one that might relieve them of stressful and violent tendencies."
And I will look up and this guy will be gone.
Last year a friend of a friend made a case over dinner that world violence would be reduced significantly if teenage boys across the world were allowed--even encouraged--to have safe sex, particularly in oppressed and depressed Third World Countries where boys, out of sheer boredom and lack of identity package all there angst and aggression and direct it at the U.S. (I'll save this topic and research for a separate blog.) As I tried to figure out the logistics of marketing this concept, and somehow selling it to the Department of Defense, he suggested that teenage boys be paired up with 30-something single women. My burst of laughter almost made me cough up my wine and I had to call a timeout.
I admit I'm going nowhere with this blog, but so is President Bush. Let me do as he does and continue. I'm going to write to the U.S. Sex Department and propose a two-part experiment. The first part will require that every single American girl and women to be given a government sponsored chastity belt with a big B for Bush. At first I went with the arbitrary and lucky number seven -- as in doing this for seven days -- until I envisioned major bloodshed, heads rolling, not any work getting done, and realized all we would need here is seven nighttime hours for the federal government to order a recall of those faulty, hazardous Bush belts.

The second experiment would require boys and men to put on the Bush belt. Take a look at this cute visual and envision a big bling of a B right over the lock, hanging on there like a hood ornament.
And if boys and men worldwide had to wear this thing for seven hours, seven days, even seven minutes, there most certainly would be bloodshed, a march on Washington, heck, Bush might be impeached not because men couldn't control themselves, but because all this talk about what doesn't work is so ridiculous, so embarrassing on so many levels. Let's start with the fact that the President of the United States is trying to look comfortable talking openly about sex. I watch him and think this is worse than having to listen to my mother, a nurse, tell me about it; and more awkward than when she used to send me and my college roommates a care package of cookies, banana bread and condoms. President Bush might want to consider leaving the delivery of this topic up to the health professionals. And if he feels pressed to step up to the podium, and make us all wonder, was Ms. Bush the first and only, he might want to remember he's got the wind behind him and the finish is in sight, the game over, the victory of him surviving two terms near complete. And while things are a total mess in Iraq, and there's no end or answer in sight, let's try and stick to what we can do as reasonably thinking human beings, who might want to stop dumping hundreds of millions of dollars on something that studies show does not work.
Check out this information in "Get the Facts on President Bush's Pet Project" by Rebecca Regan-Sachs, Georgetown University" in Campus Progress (http://www.campusprogress.org) under the headline: Bad Science, Silly Gender Stereotypes, Dangerous Misinformation : Why Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Education Isn't Working.
This "Abstinence only" endorsement, which now has a $200 million price tag, is still going on in Washington, despite no proof that it works. Jessica Arons, Legal Policy Associate for the Women’s Health Program at the Center for American Progress, says it is inaccuracies such as these that trouble her, not the inclusion of abstinence in a sex-ed curriculum. “I would like to see sex education be based on medically accurate information instead of distortions and fear,” she said. “Teaching the benefits of postponing sex is very important and should certainly be part of any sex education class…[but] sex education needs to be medically accurate and it needs to help all the students—even those who decide to have sex.”After going on a about the numbers, percentages and risk associated with condoms, birth control, etc. the article goes on to state:
Even teens who openly take “virginity pledges” to remain abstinent until marriage don’t always follow through. A CDC study showed that while many pledgers postponed having sex, 88 percent of them lost their virginity before marriage. More troubling still, the students who break this pledge are less likely to use contraceptives. In comparison, students in comprehensive sexual heath classes do not engage in sexual activity more often or sooner but do practice safer sex more consistently.My sister told me that when she was a kid, maybe around nine or ten, she was told, by me, the commanding and all-powerful older sister, and my small group of silly friends, that if a boy touched any part of her abdomen -- just touched it with his hand -- she would become pregnant. In gym class one day, amid an intense game of dodgeball, a boy who wanted a ball stripped my sister of the ball, and in doing so, ended up poking her in the lower abdomen.
She freaked out, keeping her secret to herself, asking "How I going to tell Mom and Dad?" For weeks, she watched her stomach, and after about a month, not seeing any growth, she just forgot about it.
Maybe Bush should enlist the help of older brothers and sisters, knowing that kids are far more likely to listen to them than a man in a suit. If they used this same line, sure, it would be an untruth, but it seems to stand a much better shot of being effective than telling kids to abstain, particularly when most reasonably-thinking individuals know that kids tend to do the opposite of everything adults say.
I think I'm going to write the Sex Department, telling them that I'm going to vote for the candidate--male or female--who I think has the guts, savvy and compassion to talk about the power of sex, the option of abstinence, and then take out a dildo and show an auditorium full of kids how to put on a condom properly.
I tell this story from my experience as a teacher. In my first year as an English teacher, fearing for my job and not confident in how to raise the subject appropriately, I avoided all conversations about sex -- I even skipped over passages in literature that were of a sexual nature or said such minimal, rushed comments that I know it left the kids baffled, particularly after we read of the alleged rape of a white woman by a black man in To Kill A Mockingbird. In my second year, I took a deep breath, and promised myself to just talk to them and treat them as responsible young adults. (It certainly helped to know that I had already decided to not return to teaching the following year.)
In the Spring, feeling as though I had nothing to lose, we read a story in a women's publication, a story so gripping and moving that I must retype it or find a link to it one of these days. It was about women and children who were cast aside in India because they had AIDS.
As I'm sure you know, women, left with no other option of making a living, often work as prostitutes in order to eat and provide shelter for themselves and for their children. Married truckers on the road are their regular customers. But the story wasn't about a prostitute. It was about a married woman who, like too many, was faithful to her cheating husband. She was a virgin before she got married. In fear of crossing him, she never asked her husband to wear a condom when he came home. She contracted AIDS and passed it along to her child. The writer told the story of women and children spurned by families and friends, and sent out of the villages, cast aside, unable to access any pay for the medicine. They are sent away to die.
By the end of the story, we had also followed the life of a boy who was living alone in one of the few AIDS shelters for women in children afflicted with AIDS. This boy was four years old, so sick that by the end of the story, he was down to less than 20 pounds. When the last few paragraphs about the boy, my voice cracked and I had to pause. There was a collective gasp at the end of the article, an even longer pause, a look of anger and shock and sadness in all of their eyes.
Some of the boys became infuriated with the men. A few boys didn't care; they laughed at the girls who got all worked up and glared around the room, and then begged aloud for the women to have not let the men treat them with such inhumanity. Two girls were so upset and disturbed that they came up to me after class and just looked at me. Nothing came out of their mouths. One of my favorite students approached me after they left; he was so shaken that I thought he was going to cry. In a few broken sentences, he told me that he was going to wait until he was married. And I said, "Good for you." Then I added, "If you ever change your mind--not that I would want or encourage you to change your mind--please make a wise decision."
We discussed the story more the next day, and surprisingly--maybe it was because I was teaching in liberal Manhattan--I wasn't fired or even given any heat. I reiterated to the kids that I regretted not talking as openly with the previous year's class about the risk, rewards and power of sex, and how I simply wanted them to protect themselves and others.
Everyone lives in such fear about writing about this taboo that I hesitated to write about it here in my own blog. Why? I coach kids--I'm coaching mostly boys right now. I'm now wondering if a parent reads this, will they think that I will discuss it, huddle up the boys and underline the message with a "One, two, three ... CONDOMS!"
Totally inappropriate for a basketball coach, but certainly not for a president who could take that $200 million in abstinence-spending and buy trillions of the one thing that we know works.
(A day after posting this blog, there was a leading story on teenage pregnancy increasing, and a source said that $1 billion has been spent on abstinence-only programs in the last decade. And seriously, how can it cost a BILLION dollars to pay people to tell kids not to have sex? The link: http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/12/05/teen.births.ap/index.html)